Back to the index. Or to the chambers
This article has 10 links. View as Cloud or List.
| 1 | Equality |
| 1 | Definition |
| 1 | Proof |
| 1 | Convergent Sequence |
| 1 | Induction |
| 1 | Valuation |
| 3 | Orders In A Number Field |
| 3 | Norm |
| 7 | Henselian Field |
| 13 | Hensels Lemma |
No pages link here.
Planetmath Browser (2008—2009)
BSD licence | A django site
All articles taken from PlanetMath.org snapshot under CC-BY-SA licence.
→ The original article on PlanetMath.org
Other Formats: LaTeX
Proof Of Hensels Lemma
Lemma: Using the setup and terminology of the statement of Hensel's Lemma, for
,
| i) | |||
| ii) | ![]() |
||
| iii) | |||
| iv) |
.
Proof:
All four statements clearly hold when
. Suppose they are true for
. The proof for
essentially uses Taylor's formula. Let
. Then
by definition of
, so
and hence
. Hence
To prove iii), note that
by the definitions
of
and
, so
when
since
. So by induction,
.
Finally, to prove iv) and complete
proof of the lemma,
since
and hence is in the valuation ring
of
. So by induction,
.
Proof of Hensel's Lemma:
To prove Hensel's lemma from the above lemma, note that
since
, so
converges
to
since
is complete. Thus
by continuity. But
, so
, so
and the proof is complete.
