Back to the index. Or to the chambers
This article has 30 links. View as Cloud or List.
Loading ...
Planetmath Browser (2008—2009)
BSD licence | A django site
All articles taken from PlanetMath.org snapshot under CC-BY-SA licence.
→ The original article on PlanetMath.org
Other Formats: LaTeX
Lifts Transversals
Typically one insists
so that the coset
is described uniquely
by
. However no standard terminology has emerged for transversals of this sort.
An alternative definition for a transversal is to use functions
and homomorphisms
in a method more conducive to a categorical
setting. Here one replaces the notion of a transversal as a subset of
and instead treats it as a certain type
of map
. Since
is generally not normal
in
,
simply means the set of cosets, and
is therefore a function not a homomorphism. We only require that
satisfy the following property: Given the canonical projection
map
given by
(this is generally not a homomorphism either, and so both
and
are simply functions between sets) then
. It follows immediately that the image
of
in
is a transversal in the original sense of the term.
When
is a normal subgroup of
our terminology adjusts from transversals to lifts.
It follows that
must be an epimorphism
if it has a lift. Once again it is nearly always requested that
but this restriction
is generally not part of the definition.
Because both lifts and transversals are injective mappings it is common to use the word lift/transversal for the image and the map with the context of the use providing any necessary clarification.
So we see a gradual progression in the definitions: We always have a group
and a set
, and the maps
,
satisfying
is a transversal if
for some subgroup
. Here
and
are simply functions.
is a lift if
is a group. Here
is a homomorphism and
a function.
is a splitting map if
is group and both
and
are
homomorphisms.
Finally we arrive at a stronger requirement for transversals and lifts which makes greater use of the group structure involved.
Although a general sift is no more than a map that writes the
elements of
as reduced words
in
, in many cases the sifts
have the added property of providing the words in a canonical
form.
This occurs when
where
is a transversal
of
. In such a case every element in
has a unique
decomposition
as a word
for unique
.